As artemis is an open source project I would not use a marketing like reason for a new major version (like a certain feature set). Instead I would use a major version to remove deprecated interfaces. So basically to remove stuff in a way that might be incompatible to older clients. For pure feature additions a minor version should be technically good enough.
Christian 2016-12-07 22:29 GMT+01:00 Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com>: > *** Re-sending w/ [DISCUSS] subject tag > > Kicking off a discussion on what folks would like to see in 2.0.0 release > for Artemis. My thought is that we should target ActiveMQ 5.x feature > parity in an effort to solidify Artemis in the product sense. I will detail > out specifics from my previous note on 5.x-Artemis feature gaps. > > Thoughts? > > -- -- Christian Schneider http://www.liquid-reality.de <https://owa.talend.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=3aa4083e0c744ae1ba52bd062c5a7e46&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.liquid-reality.de> Open Source Architect http://www.talend.com <https://owa.talend.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=3aa4083e0c744ae1ba52bd062c5a7e46&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.talend.com>
