Thanks for the feedback. On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 5:03 PM Jim Gomes <[email protected]> wrote: > > As you point out, the licensing seems to be compatible, but maybe a quick > > review from Apache legal might be a good idea since the intent is to > > re-integrate it into the NMS codebase as an official project. > Would you be able to explain how I'd do this (or refer me to some instructions)? > > > > The NMS code is in Subversion, and not in Git. Here is the repository > URL: > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/activemq-dotnet/ > Apache.NMS.AMQP/trunk > > . > > It does not need to be ported to Git in order to create a new AMQP > provider > > implementation. > > > > > It would make it easier to contribute thought. PRs is a perfect way to > start with contributions. >From my point of view we wouldn't strictly require a conversion to git. But I agree PR's would simplify reviews and contributions. > > > you could also include ActiveMQ Artemis to the list of brokers. > I agree it makes sense to add Artemis to the list of brokers. > > > Do you have an idea on how much effort it would take... do you have > > > any ideas for the initial implementation already? > One of my colleagues, Chris Morgan has spent more time than I have at this stage scoping the effort. We think this will likely take a few months. Cheers, Duane
