Just so as a heads up.. I will post a blog about the submission next week after the US Holiday.
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Justin Bertram <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Aspect ratio - square or banner? >> >> I think we would need both - a banner for the top of web pages plus a square >> icon for other purposes. Here [1] is an example submission from the Camel >> process which Clebert linked to at the beginning of this thread. > > If the submission is also including an abstract image.. a square image > would be great... yeah... > > > @Michael Pearce: I loved the abstraction for MQ.. > I wouldn't put the 6 on the Logo though.. just for practical reasons.. > (What to do when there's a 7?) > > >> >> >> Justin >> >> [1] >> https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1556/commits/f28ff8739cc895314a95ebec323c075c38a08813 >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Timothy Nodine" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 4:20:08 PM >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New logo discussion >> >> Aspect ratio - square or banner? >> >> Clebert Suconic wrote: >>> I talked to the PMC private list and we have consensus that starting >>> this would be a good idea. >>> >>> Before we start a call for logo, We need to define the requirements >>> for the logo and what we will ask: >>> >>> I'm thinking of defining these as requirements: >>> >>> - vector based file (.svg) and .png images >>> - an abstract image representing ActiveMQ would be awesome (we don't have >>> one) >>> - (in case of an abstract image, it would be nice to have the image >>> and the name separated, like camel) >>> - minimalistic and modern design. >>> >>> >>> >>> thoughts? >>> >> > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic -- Clebert Suconic
