Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1616
  
     @jbertram as @clebertsuconic i know you didn’t change this, but a lot of 
content is changed and is promoting a very camel approach over the use of the 
Artemis JMS bridge. We actually used the JMS bridge and still are, so bit 
shocked by the change (again realize probably should have raised this on 
original pr)
    
    Also can we bump bits like spring if now needed 3.x is very old. Also I 
think as noted camel solution over the existing should be secondary not primary 


---

Reply via email to