Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1616
@jbertram as @clebertsuconic i know you didnât change this, but a lot of
content is changed and is promoting a very camel approach over the use of the
Artemis JMS bridge. We actually used the JMS bridge and still are, so bit
shocked by the change (again realize probably should have raised this on
original pr)
Also can we bump bits like spring if now needed 3.x is very old. Also I
think as noted camel solution over the existing should be secondary not primary
---