Thanks, Bruce!
Justin On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Bruce Snyder <[email protected]> wrote: > I have added the following statement to the first paragraph in the wiki > page: > > The overall objective for working toward feature parity between > ActiveMQ 5.x and Artemis is for Artemis to eventually become ActiveMQ 6.x. > > Bruce > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Justin Bertram <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Would it be possible to clarify what, if anything, will happen if Artemis > > achieves the described level of feature parity with ActiveMQ 5.x? In > other > > words, what is the goal of Artemis' feature parity with 5.x? I think a > > broader road-map like that would really help the community as they could > > look at the Artemis road-map and see that they can help achieve the goal > > (whatever that is) by helping to implement feature X or Y. > > > > > > Justin > > > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Bruce Snyder <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > I have created a page on the wiki for the Artemis Roadmap here: > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ > > > ActiveMQ+Artemis+Roadmap > > > > > > The goal of this page is stated at the top: to identify the outstanding > > > issues that must be addressed by Artemis in order to achieve some level > > of > > > feature parity with ActiveMQ 5.x. > > > > > > I encourage everyone to contribute to this page and to discuss this > > roadmap > > > on this list. > > > > > > Bruce > > > > > > -- > > > perl -e 'print > > > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" > );' > > > > > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ > > > Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/> > > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder > > > > > > > > > -- > perl -e 'print > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );' > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ > Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder >
