+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for updating the website to communicate to users that Apollo is no > longer in active development. > > +1 for going ahead and making repo read-only. If on-going interest in > making changes arises, it could start out as a forked repo and then get > sparked re-enabled. > > > On 12/14/17 9:16 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote: > >> +1 for both the website update and making it read only >> >> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Arthur Naseef <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 >>> >>> Let's do both. Website update and making the repo read-only. >>> >>> Art >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Bruce Snyder <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> What exactly is the point of this making it read-only? And how exactly do >>>> you suggest it be deprecated? Given that the vast majority of users >>>> probably would not see any evidence of either of these actions, I don't >>>> understand the point of taking these actions. >>>> >>>> As I stated previously in the other discussion, it would be a far more >>>> effective communication to all users if the link to the Apollo website >>>> >>> was >>> >>>> moved beneath a heading named 'Attic' or 'Retired'. I'm not being >>>> >>> obtuse, I >>> >>>> am trying to understand your goal and suggesting a more visible >>>> statement >>>> to users. >>>> >>>> Bruce >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Clebert Suconic < >>>> [email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I would like to propose making Apollo a read only project. >>>>> >>>>> People can always fork it and maintain it themselves... but as of now >>>>> we haven't had anyone maintaining for the past 2 years. >>>>> >>>>> We would make it read only... and would make it clear on the website >>>>> it's been deprecated and its repository is read only. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If you are positive about this, please send your +1. >>>>> >>>>> If you have a reason to keep it active, please send your -1. >>>>> >>>>> If you don't care and really want to express your opinion your 0. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm not sending a discuss thread for this, as I would like to keep >>>>> this voting an open conversation.. so if you have other options to how >>>>> we should do, I'm open for that here. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am aiming to keep this thread open for 3 days. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Here is my +1 vote on making the git read only and deprecating it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> perl -e 'print >>>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" >>>> );' >>>> >>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ >>>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/> >>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder >>>> >>>> >
