Github user gtully commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1820
Hope we don't lose the pictures, but this PR as it stands is too simplistic
and the use case is already covered by a shared durable sub.
the prefixed fqqn will be the way to go if we need to improve in this area.
https://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/2.3.0/address-model.html#configuring-a-prefix-to-connect-to-a-specific-routing-type
thanks for the feedback :-)---
