Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2228#discussion_r208672703 --- Diff: artemis-selector/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/selector/impl/SelectorParser.java --- @@ -80,11 +78,15 @@ public static BooleanExpression parse(String sql) throws FilterException { StrictParser parser = new StrictParser(new StringReader(actual)); e = parser.JmsSelector(); } - cache.put(sql, e); + synchronized (cache) { --- End diff -- @jbertram @michaelandrepearce If it is not an hot path I thing that what Justin is suggesting makes totally sense: anyway if we can afford to put guava in place I believe that https://google.github.io/guava/releases/16.0/api/docs/com/google/common/cache/CacheBuilder.html#maximumSize(long) would be a good option too. It will scale with a factor specified by the concurrent level specified, but it could (I do not remember TBH) introduce some behavioural changes from the current impl. I understand both @michaelandrepearce and @jbertram opinions so I think that the general rule to balance changes vs effectiveness on common case apply here: I leave you decide how much this tradeoff apply here... I'm honored to be "summoned" :+1:
---