Github user gemmellr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2490#discussion_r246416127
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/amqp/AmqpReceiverPriorityTest.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.integration.amqp;
+
+import org.apache.activemq.transport.amqp.client.AmqpClient;
+import org.apache.activemq.transport.amqp.client.AmqpConnection;
+import org.apache.activemq.transport.amqp.client.AmqpMessage;
+import org.apache.activemq.transport.amqp.client.AmqpReceiver;
+import org.apache.activemq.transport.amqp.client.AmqpSession;
+import org.apache.qpid.proton.amqp.Symbol;
+import org.apache.qpid.proton.amqp.UnsignedInteger;
+import org.junit.Test;
+
+import java.util.HashMap;
+import java.util.Map;
+
+/**
+ * Test various behaviors of AMQP receivers with the broker.
+ */
+public class AmqpReceiverPriorityTest extends AmqpClientTestSupport {
+
+ @Test(timeout = 30000)
+ public void testPriority() throws Exception {
+
+ AmqpClient client = createAmqpClient();
+ AmqpConnection connection = addConnection(client.connect());
+ AmqpSession session = connection.createSession();
+
+ Map<Symbol, Object> properties1 = new HashMap<>();
+ properties1.put(Symbol.getSymbol("priority"), 5);
+ AmqpReceiver receiver1 = session.createReceiver(getQueueName(),
null, false, false, properties1);
+ receiver1.flow(100);
+
+ Map<Symbol, Object> properties2 = new HashMap<>();
+ properties2.put(Symbol.getSymbol("priority"), 50);
+ AmqpReceiver receiver2 = session.createReceiver(getQueueName(),
null, false, false, properties2);
+ receiver2.flow(100);
+
+ Map<Symbol, Object> properties3 = new HashMap<>();
+ properties3.put(Symbol.getSymbol("priority"), 10);
+ AmqpReceiver receiver3 = session.createReceiver(getQueueName(),
null, false, false, properties3);
+ receiver3.flow(100);
+
+ sendMessages(getQueueName(), 5);
+
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
+ AmqpMessage message1 = receiver1.receiveNoWait();
--- End diff --
I believe the test clients receiveNoWait only polls its local queue, so
this might now likely sporadically fail due to racing the deliveries. I was
only suggesting recieveNoWait as potential initial verification within the loop
for non-receiving consumers, to be followed up or substituted by a more
stringent final check.
---
