fixed... thanks for bringing it to my attention. I had spent time
looking on the URls but still ended up making a mistake.
Thanks

On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 6:07 PM Clebert Suconic
<clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I see.  Sorry about that.  I will fix it later tonight.
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:33 AM Timothy Bish <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It would appear that this problem has occurred again.  The past releases
>> page was partially updated but in all cases the updates were incorrect and
>> now the download links are broken.  The links to the all broker release
>> archives themselves point to Apache Archives but the action=download bit at
>> the end of the URI was not removed.  The links to the checksums and
>> signatures were not updated to point to archives it seems and so those are
>> also broken.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 6:44 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Its more that the download links for the previous release themselves
>> > are broken thats the issue. The docs link is often incorrect too, but
>> > it tends to at least somewhat 'work' when wrong (from pointing to
>> > "latest" rather than the actual versions release docs).
>> >
>> > I think the existing process needed (copy+paste the previous entry in
>> > file, find+replace the version number) is actually fairly easy. Its
>> > just not being followed, and the links also arent being inspected
>> > afterwards to notice that it wasnt.
>> >
>> > Robbie
>> >
>> > On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 17:25, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Please accept my apologies... I have been on so many channels all at
>> > > once that I overlooked into this.
>> > >
>> > > it would be nice to make this simpler though. I have tried to get rid
>> > > of the documentation per previous version for instance (you can just
>> > > download the documentation with the zip).
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 5:35 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Yes it is, I even noted I found it was already documented when I went
>> > > > to add one of the times I was reporting the issue.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blame/2.8.1/RELEASING.md#L299
>> > > > (The details are a touch stale now in referring to html of the old
>> > > > site update process)
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 10:22, Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > is that step in:
>> > > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/master/RELEASING.md
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 12:29, Robbie Gemmell <
>> > robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I've found that the docs/downloads/etc links for recent releases on
>> > > > > > the past releases page are broken nearly every time I have used the
>> > > > > > page over the last couple of years. I've fixed it a bunch of times,
>> > > > > > reported it several times to try and stop it from actually
>> > happening,
>> > > > > > and fixed it some more times as it keeps doing so.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > It is difficult to understand how the same issue keeps happening
>> > > > > > repeatedly given how trivial the page is to update and how
>> > quick/easy
>> > > > > > it is to verify the links while doing so, e.g by hovering over
>> > them,
>> > > > > > or actually clicking them like a user might and see them 404 or go
>> > the
>> > > > > > wrong place if the files havent been cleared from the mirroring
>> > area
>> > > > > > just yet.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > As the page is proving so troublesome to maintain in working
>> > order, I
>> > > > > > think the per-release content might be better jsut removed and only
>> > > > > > the direct link to the archive parent dir left. Thats where I will
>> > be
>> > > > > > going directly in future to save myself the hassle (of noticing the
>> > > > > > page is broken and feeling I should report it or fix it yet again).
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Robbie
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Clebert Suconic
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Tim Bish
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Reply via email to