Hi Colm

I will do a review as I'm preparing 5.16.0 and 5.15.11 releases.

Thanks for the reminder.

Regards
JB

On Thursday, October 17, 2019 13:52 CEST, Colm O hEigeartaigh 
<cohei...@apache.org> wrote:
 Hi,

I previously posted this to the private list (last year), but I didn't get
any reply - so maybe I'll have more luck here :-)

I'd like to clear up 3 ActiveMQ CVEs that are reported at NIST, which have
no "fix" version associated with them. Please give me some feedback on the
following:

1) https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-5182 (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248809). The redhat bug is
marked as "WONTFIX", so I'm not sure if this was accepted as a valid issue
or not?

2) https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-5183. This is reported against
the HawtIO console for AMQ. If the fix was in HawtIO, and not AMQ, and we
don't bundle Hawt IO, then the CPE is invalid, as the issue has nothing to
do with AMQ. Could someone confirm this? Was there any fix made to the AMQ
codebase for this issue?

3) https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-5184. This is reported against
the HawtIO console for AMQ. If the fix was in HawtIO, and not AMQ, and we
don't bundle Hawt IO, then the CPE is invalid, as the issue has nothing to
do with AMQ. Could someone confirm this? Was there any fix made to the AMQ
codebase for this issue?

I can communicate the findings with NIST to update the CVEs if I get some
feedback.

Colm.


 

Reply via email to