+1 for dedicated thread. I will start it. Thanks, Regards JB
On 03/12/2019 14:30, Clebert Suconic wrote: > What Infra offered didn’t make it easy to make a service like project to be > officially built on docker. > I would appreciate a separate discussion if you find a way. > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 11:50 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > >> Hi Clebert, >> >> The purpose is more to populate docker hub within the build. >> >> It's what I'm doing for Karaf: >> >> https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/karaf/tags >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 02/12/2019 20:51, Clebert Suconic wrote: >>> The "official" image is something you will have to work with Apache >>> Infra. their support is limited as in Apache the release is the >>> Source. >>> >>> I hope things have changed on apache regarding docker. In any case it >>> would really benefit to have a separate thread discussion showing the >>> progress on that front, as in if the infra team have improved their >>> support on docker or not. >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 3:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> as part of the ActiveMQ 5.16.0 preparation, I works on: >>>> - Dockerfile/Docker image to provide an "official" Apache Docker image >>>> for ActiveMQ >>>> - Several k8s yml files (with different scenarios) >>>> >>>> I propose to integrate this in the ActiveMQ codebase. >>>> >>>> Thoughts ? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> -- >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
