Hi Arthur, That’s a real issue due a change introduce in the default jetty.xml to load the jetty-realm.
My bad, I will fix that. Thanks ! Regards JB > Le 1 déc. 2020 à 05:00, Arthur Naseef <a...@amlinv.com> a écrit : > > I'm running the build on an Ubuntu system and getting 4 test failures. I > retried 1 and it repeated. > > I'll look at the failures more tomorrow. Here are the errors from the test > I retried: > > [ERROR] > testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1[activemq-leveldb-replicating.xml](org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest) > Time elapsed: 1.222 s <<< ERROR! > org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating > bean with name 'invokeStart' defined in file > [/home/art/work/activemq/src/activemq/assembly/target/conf/jetty.xml]: > Invocation of init method failed; nested exception is > java.lang.IllegalStateException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: > file:target/conf/jetty-realm.properties > at > org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1(BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.java:95) > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: file:target/conf/jetty-realm.properties > at > org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1(BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.java:95) > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: > file:target/conf/jetty-realm.properties > at > org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1(BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.java:95) > > Art > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 5:37 AM Christopher Shannon < > christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1, >> >> -verified checksum and gpg signature >> -ran a build and ran through smoke tests >> -ran broker from release to verify it starts >> >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 8:43 PM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> The issues I was noting were with the staged dist repo contents rather >>> than the maven repo. There is a helper script for prepping the dist >>> area contents inc verifying the gpg sig at >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/ >>> >>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 17:43, Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Robbie- >>>> >>>> Here is a release validation script: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/587 < >>> https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/587> >>>> >>>> You can pass an arg to change the Maven repo. >>>> >>>> Currently it validates: >>>> >>>> 1. Download tar.gz and zip files >>>> 2. Validates SHA1 and MD5 >>>> 3. Extracts the zip and tar.gz >>>> 4. Cleans up after itself >>>> >>>> Next step would be to add the gpg signature validation >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Matt Pavlovich >>>> >>>>> On Nov 27, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Robbie Gemmell < >> robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The issues I noted (.md5 present, -bin files missing) dont appear to >>>>> be fixed for 5.15.14 yet? Still showing via the dist area HTTP view >>>>> and svn directly for me at least. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 15:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> >>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> It’s already fixed for the 5.15.14 release and I will push the fix >> on >>> the script. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>>> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 16:10, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> >>> a écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would fix the dist problems before starting another release >>>>>>> personally, so that any new voters can properly inspect things. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Aside, I since saw that you only added the .md5 this morning along >>>>>>> with the .sha512 contents. I'm not sure how so many people managed >> to >>>>>>> vote for it without verifying the checksum, except perhaps everyone >>>>>>> just assumed someone else would do it. That's one reason it's good >> to >>>>>>> say what testing you actually did when voting, to help spot such >>> gaps. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Robbie >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 12:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofre < >> j...@nanthrax.net> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeah I know ;) Not a problem. We can wait ! I will move forward on >>> 5.16.1 in the meantime. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks ! >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 12:48, Robbie Gemmell < >> robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> >>> a écrit : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Many of the people you are looking to remind are likely not >> around >>> to >>>>>>>>> see it, being on vacation either for or just around the US >>>>>>>>> Thanksgiving. It's probably the second worst point of the year to >>> have >>>>>>>>> a release vote open unfortunately. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'd note that the binary archives are missing from the dist >> staging >>>>>>>>> area, and there is an MD5 checksum present for the source release >>>>>>>>> which should be removed given they aren't meant to be >> distributed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 04:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofre < >>> j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Gently reminder about this vote. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks ! >>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net >>> >>> a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote. >>>>>>>>>>> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12348294 >>> < >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12348294 >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The Maven staging repository is: >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/ >>> < >>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/ >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The dist staging repository is: >>>>>>>>>>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ < >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Git tag: >>>>>>>>>>> activemq-5.15.14 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please vote to approve this release: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific >>> comments) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks ! >>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>
