Thanks for the feedback - I'll look at this targeting 5.17! Jon
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:32 PM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 JSON-B using Jackson and targeting 5.17.x > > Given the popularity of pairing ActiveMQ w/ Camel and CXF, I think staying > with Jackson is a good idea and would cause less volatility. > > > On Jan 28, 2021, at 5:36 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > > > > Hi Jon, > > > > Clearly +1 for me to go using JSON-B. > > > > However, I will focus this for 5.17.x. I’m working on cleanup, update, > etc for this version, so I think it’s the good timing to use JSON-B. > > > > So, +1 to use master (5.17.x) for that. If you can wait a bit, I can > merge the first round cleanup (removing leveled, etc). > > Else, go ahead, we will rebase. > > > > My +1 > > > > Regards > > JB > > > >> Le 28 janv. 2021 à 11:34, Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >> > >> Hi All > >> > >> Just to introduce myself a little, I am one of the contributors to > Apache > >> TomEE, and we have been embedding ActiveMQ 5 for some time, and have > found > >> it a really nice solution, in particular enabling users to work with JMS > >> with almost no setup. > >> > >> We do have a desire to slim down our dependencies, and I would like to > >> propose that ActiveMQ potentially use JSON-B as opposed to being tightly > >> coupled to one specific JSON parsing library. > >> > >> This has previously been discussed on > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/AMQ/issues/AMQ-7072, and it > sounded > >> like the community was open to using JSON-B, but would strongly want to > >> stick with Jackson as the default serializer. > >> > >> I'd like to have a go at working on this. If I was able to make the > change > >> to use JSON-B, (and I appreciate that may need work here (which I'm > also ok > >> to contribute to): > >> https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-future-ideas/issues/19. If I > could do > >> this, and keep Jackson as the default serializer, would this be a > >> contribution that the community could consider? > >> > >> Many thanks > >> > >> Jon > > > >
