Artemis is on our repo, so we intend on creating images for it.
Rod.
On 2/17/21, 11:39 AM, "Clebert Suconic" <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL email. Use
CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding. (Sender:
dev-return-72215-JENKIR14=nationwide....@activemq.apache.org)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be nice to do the same with Artemis... we already have scripts to
build the images as part of the build.. we just don't have the builds yet.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 10:36 AM Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) <
jenki...@nationwide.com> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> Quick introduction: My name is Rod. I work with Chuck. I am stepping in
> while he is out. I am the coworker who does the TomEE images.
>
>
>
> I have a question on the tarballs on https://archive.apache.org and
> https://repo1.maven.org. I noticed that the images are not the same SHA
> and not the same size. Is there a reason for that?
>
>
>
> BTW, the Dockerfile is mostly complete,
>
https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq/blob/master/classic/5.16/jre11/openjdk-buster/Dockerfile.
> I think the only thing left was getting the maven download to work as the
> fallback to the other repos. I can still make that work, but I thought it
> was strange to see a difference in the sizes of the files.
>
>
>
> This is what we are proposing. I am going to start on the other options
> later today. We would be happy for any feedback.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rod.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *"Shank, Charles R" <shan...@nationwide.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, February 16, 2021 at 8:49 AM
> *To: *Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net>, Matt Pavlovich <
> mattr...@gmail.com>, "dev@activemq.apache.org" <dev@activemq.apache.org>
> *Cc: *"Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)" <jenki...@nationwide.com>
> *Subject: *Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ
>
>
>
> Jean,
>
>
>
> I agree we should make this its own issue and open up the discussion to
> the ActiveMQ community
>
>
>
> Currently, we are working on the following repository to provide generic
> images available to the ActiveMQ community. You can follow our progress
> here: *https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq
> <https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq>*
>
>
>
> Because the needs of the community are varied, we recommend making
> multiple versions of ActiveMQ classic and Artemis. The repos also will be
> created to include OpenJDK and AdoptopenJDK. We also recommend leaving
> room for other operating systems other than Debian and multiple versions
of
> JDK within both OpenJDK and AdoptopenJDK.
>
>
>
> Given the number of options, we are not sure how we would go about using a
> module to maintain the dockerfiles, but would be open to it. Once we get
> our dockerimages complete, we can discuss how they are maintained going
> forward. We will also investigate with the folks at
> https://github.com/docker-library to see what is required to get our
> images listed as the official images. I have a coworker that is
> responsible for the TomEE official images and has some contacts there.
>
>
>
> We would like to get the communities thoughts and input on this course of
> action.
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
> Chuck Shank
>
>
>
> [image: cid:image001.gif@01D70449.0A4B26E0]
> [image: cid:image002.gif@01D70449.0A4B26E0]
>
>
>
--
Clebert Suconic
