Yes but then you will have the same GA as Jakarta EE 9 except for the version.

Le 10/03/2021 à 14:35, Clebert Suconic a écrit :
> My understanding is that eclipse EE8 is a direct replacement of
> geronimo-JMS... so it can just be replaced.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 6:11 AM Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> It seems like this could make for a bit of awkward dependency
>> management in some cases, from then requiring 2 different versions of
>> the same dependencies within the regular build. Is the thinking to
>> perhaps introduce separate properties for the different versions
>> needed and have the parent pom change to use the EE 8 versions where
>> needed, and override that in modules needing the EE 9 version instead?
>>
>> On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 21:42, Domenico Francesco Bruscino
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> ActiveMQ Artemis depends on some Apache Geronimo Specs artifacts [1]
>>> and Javax artifacts [2] for the Java EE APIs. Most of them could be
>>> migrated to their respective Jakarta EE artifacts, given that Jakarta EE
>> 8
>>> provides backwards compatibility within the javax* namespace.
>>> The license of Jakarta EE artifacts is Eclipse Public License 2.0 [3] so
>>> they may be included in binary form within an Apache product, see ASF 3RD
>>> PARTY LICENSE POLICY [4].
>>> Do you have any concern on migrating to Jakarta EE 8 artifacts?
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-annotation_1.2_spec/1.0
>>> org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec/1.0.1
>>> org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec/2.0.0
>>> org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec/1.0 [5]
>>> org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jaxrs_2.1_spec/1.1
>>> org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec/1.1 [6]
>>> org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jms_2.0_spec/1.0-alpha-2 [5]
>>> org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-json_1.0_spec/1.0-alpha-1 [5]
>>> org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec/1.1.1 [5]
>>> org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec/1.0 [6]
>>>
>>> [2]
>>> javax/activation/activation/1.1.1 [5]
>>> javax/annotation/javax.annotation-api/1.3.2
>>> javax/enterprise/cdi-api/1.2 [6]
>>> javax/inject/javax.inject/1 [5]
>>> javax/management/j2ee/javax.management.j2ee-api/1.1.1
>>> javax/xml/bind/jaxb-api/2.3.1 [5]
>>>
>>> [3] https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/
>>>
>>> [4] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
>>>
>>> [5] this artifact is included in the release package
>>>
>>> [6] no jakarta artifact with a matching version exits
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Domenico

Reply via email to