I meant I won't -1 as you can't veto releases (only code changes)

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 11:38 AM Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> -0, I won't veto if others want to go ahead but as Robbie pointed out it
> was agreed upon to do 5.16.2 first because 5.15.15 will be the last release
> of 5.15.x and is EOL. This way we have a release ready to point to for
> others to use when announcing EOL.
>
> The discussion was originally here:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-Preparing-5-16-2-5-15-15-releases-tp4760736.html
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 7:22 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote. We fixed the issue
>> identified in AMQ-8219 and this is a new take on 5.15.15 release.
>>
>> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially:
>> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades
>> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +
>> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking Karaf
>> http commands and refresh
>> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack
>> processing
>>
>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12349417
>> <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12349417
>> >
>>
>> The Maven staging repository is:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1227/
>> <
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1227/
>> >
>>
>> The dist staging repository is:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>
>>
>> Git tag:
>> activemq-5.15.15
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Thanks !
>> Regards
>> JB
>
>

Reply via email to