Would you be able to present a summary of that discussion for the curious?

I don’t feel strongly myself, but would be interested as to the conversation 
given that many Apache projects have a single project, and then can use 
something like “Component” to filter down the scope - it definitely makes 
searching+filtering easy.
In particular, things like “STOMP Specification” and “CLI tools” don’t seem to 
have many issues or much usage at all, so the alternative approach would be to 
migrate all existing issues under a unified ActiveMQ umbrella project (Jira 
provides this functionality with a couple of button clicks). Wondering if that 
was discussed.

Thanks!

Étienne Hossack
Software Development Engineer, Amazon MQ
email: ehoss...@amazon.com<mailto:ehoss...@amazon.com>

[cid:0CFB4B72-BC66-42A8-953C-779D7FAE3DC0@amazon.com]

On Sep 20, 2021, at 12:17 PM, Justin Bertram 
<jbert...@apache.org<mailto:jbert...@apache.org>> wrote:

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the 
content is safe.



I think it would be simpler and more consistent for project contributors if
we had a new Jira project specifically for the website. Currently issues
for the website are opened in the AMQ [1] Jira project that's dedicated to
the "Classic" broker. Each project component has its own Jira project [2]
so it seems reasonable that the website would as well.

To be clear, ActiveMQ currently has 9 associated Jira projects [3]. For
good or for ill this is the way things are organized so I think it makes
sense to be consistent.

I've already discussed this with the PMC and they were unanimously in favor
(after some discussion). However, this discussion was inadvertently private
so I wanted to open it up to the wider community.


Justin

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/AMQ
[2] http://activemq.apache.org/issues
[3]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProjects.jspa?selectedCategory=11160&selectedProjectType=all&sortColumn=name&sortOrder=ascending

Reply via email to