+1, built from source and ran some of the tests

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 3:47 PM Domenico Francesco Bruscino <
bruscin...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include
> pom.xml "<parent>(.|\n)*<version>2.20.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./`
> * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 32 using OpenJDK 11
> * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome`
> * Checked producing, browsing and consuming messages from a queue using
> `artemis check queue --name TEST --produce 1000 --browse 1000 --consume
> 1000`
>
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 at 18:23, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.20.0 release...
> >
> >
> > There is a few improvements and bug fixes on this release, there's one
> > feature added:
> >
> > [ARTEMIS-2097] - Pause and Block Producers
> >
> > This is also the first release where we are requiring JDK 11+. JDK 1.8
> > won't work on this release any longer.
> >
> >
> > You can access the release notes and the git report here:
> >
> >
> https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/release-notes-2.20.0
> >
> >
> > The source and binary distributions:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.20.0
> >
> > The maven repository is here:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1240
> >
> > In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:
> >
> >
> https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html
> >
> >
> > The source tag:
> >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq-artemis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.20.0
> >
> >
> > I will update the website after the vote has passed.
> >
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve this release
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
> > This also records my +1 (Binding) vote.
> >
> > I will keep this VOTE open until Monday Dec-20th 12:30 PM US EST time
> > as the usual 72 hours for the release would take us to a Saturday.
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
> >
>

Reply via email to