FYI - I fixed that link.

Justin

On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 9:25 AM Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> wrote:

> It's definitely broken, Michael. I checked the website source code and it
> does, in fact, reference "activemq.org" which is incorrect. Thanks for
> the report!
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 9:12 AM Schäfer, Michael (C33) <
> michael.schae...@destatis.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Matt-
>>
>> it's not that https://activemq.apache.org/version-5-initial-configuration
>> that wouldn't render as expected, it's the link "Website" (
>> http://activemq.org) on it that takes me to an unrelated page.
>>
>> I cleared the cache completely, the behavior stayed the same. But if it
>> works for you, it's probably local. If so, sorry for the inconvenience.
>>
>> -Michael
>>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com>
>> Gesendet: Montag, 20. Dezember 2021 15:49
>> An: dev@activemq.apache.org
>> Betreff: [EXTERN]Re: Broken link
>>
>> Hi Michael-
>>
>> The page comes up correctly from a number of different locations:
>>
>>
>> https://geopeeker.com/fetch/?url=https://activemq.apache.org/version-5-initial-configuration
>> <
>> https://geopeeker.com/fetch/?url=https://activemq.apache.org/version-5-initial-configuration
>> >
>>
>> You might want to check your cache or look into if there is a DNS problem
>> on your network.
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>> > On Dec 20, 2021, at 8:06 AM, Schäfer, Michael (C33) <
>> michael.schae...@destatis.de> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > not sure if this is the right list for reporting a "broken" link on,
>> but it seems to suit better than the users list.
>> >
>> > On https://activemq.apache.org/version-5-initial-configuration, the
>> link "Website" under "Related reading" shows as "activemq.orq" in the
>> browser's status line, but takes me to
>> >
>> > https://www.2bguide.com/fakten/apache-webserver
>> >
>> > a web site in German, instead of (as I think should be correct) to the
>> ActiveMQ home page. Strikes me as strange...
>> >
>> > Hope I could help,
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > Michael
>> >
>>
>>

Reply via email to