On 2022/01/14 22:16:31 Clebert Suconic wrote:
> you guys should use cherry-pick -x between main and 5.16.x
>
>
> then you could use this type of reporting I'm generating for between
> main and 2.19.x on activemq artemis. it's fairly helpful I think.
> easier to manage what's missing between the branches...
>
>
> let me know if you need some help using that..(although I'm not
> available next week as I'm going out on a trip for a family issue)
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:22 AM JB Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> >
> > Ok I remember the discussion now.
> >
> > Let’s keep it in 5.16.x and focus on 5.17.0 where it’s already removed.
> >
> > Sorry about the noise ;)
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > > Le 12 janv. 2022 à 16:06, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net> a
écrit :
> > >
> > > Yes, I know: my point is also to remove from activemq-5.16.x
> > >
> > > If no objection, I will remove it from there.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > >> Le 12 janv. 2022 à 16:03, Matt Pavlovich <ma...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > >>
> > >> Hey JB-
> > >>
> > >> I already removed it from 5.17.0 (main)
> > >>
> > >> -Matt
> > >>
> > >>>> On Jan 12, 2022, at 4:16 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> ActiveMQ provides activemq-camel component.
> > >>>
> > >>> This component is "old" (using Camel 2.25.x) and has been replaced
by camel-activemq and/or camel-jms.
> > >>>
> > >>> I propose to remove ActiveMQ Camel from the ActiveMQ code.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thoughts ?
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards
> > >>> JB
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>
