I would say less is better if trying to do the release soon, don't want to rush anything at the last minute. Seems like there is a lot of JMS 2.0 stuff still outstanding and a lot of back and forth on it so I would expect some pushback depending on what goes into it if it isn't spec compliant, etc.
And again we can't call it a JMS 2.0 implementation in terms of a feature as we are not actually supporting JMS 2.0 if all the operations are just UOE. There's no actual functionality being provided other than supporting the Jar (which people can already do) On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 10:36 AM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Echoing JB.. no JMS 2.0 API in 5.16.x. > > For 5.17.0, the changes for JMS 2.0 API with UOE, and Camel removal > pre-req are merged into main. The first pass of implemented methods is > sitting in PR (I’ll merge this week). I originally thought that we’d need > more time for JMS 2.0 implementation, but I expect to have most > functionality in place for the 5.17.0 release. > > -Matt Pavlovich > > > On Jan 24, 2022, at 8:32 AM, Christopher Shannon < > christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The plan is still just to use the Unsupported exceptions for the JMS 2.0 > > api right? > > > > Also, I was having some issues building a test 2.17.0 version as the test > > modules have been moved out of the main modules section in the pom.xml > and > > moved under a profile called full.test. This is a problem because you > can't > > build the project at all the first time. The way to fix it is to still > > include the modules to be compiled and built all the time but only run > the > > tests when the profile is set (so only activate the surefire plugin when > > the profile is set) > > > > This commit breaks it: > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq/commit/b39cd907fd10279b668eee7d0fac304cf23738f2 > > > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 9:18 AM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Hey JB- > >> > >> Thanks for the update. I have one more PR for 5.16.4, I’ll get it out > this > >> morning for review. > >> > >> I’ll start merging my 5.17.0 PRs and reading a few others. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> Matt > >> > >> > >>> On Jan 24, 2022, at 1:15 AM, JB Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi guys > >>> > >>> New update: > >>> > >>> - 5.16.4 is ready to be submitted to vote. I’m doing the Jira triage > and > >> I will send the vote. > >>> - 5.17.0 is almost ready. Log4j2 update works at runtime, I just have > to > >> fix some tests (which use appender/logger). I gonna work on this. We > are on > >> track: I still plan to submit 5.17.0 to vote end of Jan. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> JB > >>> > >>>> Le 12 janv. 2022 à 12:32, Jonathan Gallimore < > >> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >>>> > >>>> Hi JB, > >>>> > >>>> That PR looks good in my tests here - thanks for the fix! > >>>> > >>>> Jon > >>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 7:51 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > j...@nanthrax.net> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi guys, > >>>>> > >>>>> I fixed the SSLTransport issue (about the SSLParameters set): > >>>>> > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/744 > >>>>> > >>>>> As soon as Jenkins will be happy, I will merge. > >>>>> > >>>>> Then, I will move forward with releases: > >>>>> > >>>>> - 5.17.0, I'm rebasing and polishing log4j2 update PR > >>>>> - 5.16.4, I'm doing a new pass on Jira, we are good to go with this > >>>>> release, I will submit it to vote soon > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards > >>>>> JB > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 04/01/2022 18:10, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: > >>>>>> Of course, I'd be more than happy to - thank you! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Jon > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 4:57 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > j...@nanthrax.net> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Jon > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> No problem at all ;) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I think I have a fix. I will create a PR, if you have time to take > a > >>>>>>> look, it would be great. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks ! > >>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>> JB > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 04/01/2022 17:07, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: > >>>>>>>> Hi JB > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> This has come about from merging in my PR (thank you for that, by > >> the > >>>>>>> way). > >>>>>>>> I can see the test failures too, and will help identify a fix. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Jon > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 2, 2022 at 6:38 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre < > >> j...@nanthrax.net> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hi guys, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Just to let you know that I identified a regression in ActiveMQ: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-8445 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> It has been introduced by commit > >>>>>>> 34c4e186fe3d71c82866e89afd2706a3619ca2b4 > >>>>>>>>> trying to fix AMQ-8275 (related to JDK16+ support in > SslTransport). > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I’m working on a fix about that. Then I will move forward on > 5.16.4 > >>>>>>>>> release first, then 5.17.0. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I will keep you posted soon. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>>>> JB > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
