Hello Jean-Louis, Echoing what JB said— with some additional details.
The main branch (5.17.0-SNAPSHOT) has jakarta jar with javax.jms import now. I’m working on the JMS 2.0 implementation (preview support) behind that as well and have a JMS2 implementation status tracking page https://activemq.apache.org/jms2 <https://activemq.apache.org/jms2> We have a 5.17.0 planning draft in a JIRA here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-8486 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-8486> The focus is on getting 5.17.0 out, and then we can pick up discussions around alignment of various combinations: ActiveMQ v5.16.x - JDK 8 - Geronimo JMS Jar - import javax.jms ActiveMQ v5.17.x - JDK 11 - Jakarta JMS Jar - import javax.jms ActiveMQ v? - JDK ? - Jakarta JMS Jar - import jakarta.jms etc. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Feb 16, 2022, at 9:15 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > > Hi Jean-Louis, > > It's actually planned for ActiveMQ 5.17.0 (switching to jakarta-ee). > I'm working on some updates/fixes for 5.17.0, hopefully I should be > able to submit to vote next week. > > Not yet the case for 5.16.x. > > Regards > JB > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:07 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro > <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to know if there is an available version of ActiveMQ Classic for >> Jakarta? >> I think we can have a quick approach with the shade plugin and I'm happy to >> contribute it if it helps. >> >> Until we have to do deeper changes and logic, it may allow third party >> projects like TomEE to use it. >> >> WDYT? >> >> -- >> Jean-Louis Monteiro >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> http://www.tomitribe.com
