I agree.

@Matt @Robbie @Tim is it ok for you to have 5.17.0 with Spring5,
log4j2, JDK11 and include JMS2 in 5.18.0 that can happen quickly ?

Regards
JB

On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 3:09 PM Christopher Shannon
<christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm +1 on moving forward without JMS 2.0 until 5.18.0.  The reality is there 
> is no consensus to keep it in 5.17.0. There are multiple people who do not 
> want to include it in 5.17.0 so it's time to move on without. We also need to 
> revert the commits from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7309 as 
> there is no reason to include that now.
>
> So I say go ahead with the release and vote (after wrapping things up 
> including reverting that AMQ-7309 JMS 2 stuff).
>
> I'm pretty tired of the back and forth and fighting over version numbers to 
> be honest and just want to move on. It's not productive to keep arguing 
> anymore over a version...5.18.0 can literally go out whenever we want.
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 8:50 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> 
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Quick update about 5.17.0 release:
>>
>> - I fixed/squash log4j2 update PR
>> (https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/662). I think it's OK (I'm
>> waiting for the end of Jenkins).
>> - I'm creating Apache POM 25 update PR
>> - I'm creating Spring 5.3.16 update PR
>>
>> So, ActiveMQ 5.17.0 is almost ready from this standpoint.
>>
>> As I would like to start the vote asap, It would be great to act about
>> JMS2. Do you want me to start with different options ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 5:55 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi guys,
>> >
>> > I worked on the log4j2 update PR this weekend, fixing almost all unit
>> > tests using a custom appender. I just have to fix the
>> > activemq-web-demo test and squash, and the PR will be good to be
>> > merged. I will do that today.
>> >
>> > Then, later today and tomorrow I will work on using jetty modules
>> > instead of jetty-all and update to Jetty 9.4.45.
>> >
>> > I will do a pass on Jira and PRs, especially the ones from Matt. @Matt
>> > can you please ping me on slack to check together the status of the
>> > PRs ?
>> >
>> > Regarding this, I would like to submit 5.17.0 to vote this Thursday if
>> > there are no objections.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > JB

Reply via email to