Does it matter how an issue was found ? Some explanation in what the fix is that’s a fair point. But how it was found seems irrelevant to me.
Like not trying to play sarcasm here but I once found an issue on my dreams. (Literally) On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 4:26 PM Christopher’ Shannon .l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: > As I brought up in othe Artemis 2.21.0 vote thread I xolahave noticed a > pattern > of Jiras that have almost no information in them which makes it very > difficult to follow along with bug fixes and new features. This made > reviewing the current release more difficult. Some issues are trivial but > most issues should have a good description to document the change. > > I am proposing that going forward we come up with a template/guide or > checklist of some sort for Jiras for people to follow, kind of like coding > standards or a checklist for reviewing pull requests. > > It doesn't have to be super strict, but some guidelines might be nice. Off > the top of my head here are a few things: > > New Features: > 1) What's the motivation of the feature? Why is it needed? > 2) A high level description on the plan to implement the feature > 2) Maybe some details on how testing will be done > > Bug Fixes: > 1) How was the issue discovered? > 2) How to reproduce and what versions are affected? > 3) whats the proposed fix? > > My main motivation here is Jiras but we could also have guidelines for > commit messages if we want too. > > Thoughts? > -- Clebert Suconic
