+1 (binding)

I've run the tests against ArtemisNetClient[1] 2.12.0. It's all green.

To make the testing easier, I've created a docker image[2] with the release
candidate binaries. Feel free to use it to run your tests.

Cheers,
Krzysztof

[1] https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client/pull/429
[2] docker pull havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client-test-broker:2.28.0-rc1

On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 1:21 AM Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1, looks good to me
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 4:07 PM Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 15:19, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0 release.
> > >
> > > I would like to highlight the following changes in this release:
> > >
> > > - Page counting improved. We no longer store counters in the journal
> > > simply relying on paging itself for that
> > > - We implemented a way to sync mirror from AMQP Broker Connections
> > >
> > > For a complete release notes:
> > >
> >
> https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/release-notes-2.28.0
> > >
> > > The git commit report:
> >
> https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/commit-report-2.28.0
> > >
> > >
> > > Source and binary staged distributions:
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.28.0
> > >
> > > The maven repository:
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1268
> > >
> > > In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:
> > >
> >
> https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html
> > >
> > >
> > > The current release candidate is tagged on the git repository as 2.28.0
> > >
> > > I will update the website after the vote has passed
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve this release
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and why)
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion (I would appreciate a reason why if this is your
> > > choice as well)
> >
>

Reply via email to