+1 for apache/activemq-classic and apache/activemq-artemis Domenico
On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 at 17:26, Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> wrote: > I'm fine with using: > > - apache/activemq-classic > - apache/activemq-artemis > > > Justin > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 9:55 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > > > Hi Justin, > > > > It has been discussed but not the name specifically. > > > > As we use apache/activemq-artemis, I thought "logical" to use > > apache/activemq (but maybe activemq-classic makes more sense). > > > > I'm not sure we will be able to use apache/activemq/classic and > > apache/activemq/artemis, but we can definitely use > > apache/activemq-classic as apache/activemq-artemis. > > > > I can rename right now. > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 3:57 PM Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > This weekend JB announced [1] the availability of official Docker > images > > > for ActiveMQ "Classic" in the "apache/activemq" namespace [2]. > > > > > > Perhaps I missed it, but I don't recall (and can't find) any discussion > > of > > > or notification about this. Users will certainly expect images for both > > > "Classic" and Artemis so my concern is regarding the namespace. If both > > > "Classic" and Artemis share the apache/activemq namespace directly then > > > there may eventually be version number conflicts and there certainly > will > > > be confusion about which version is which. > > > > > > Before these images are widely adopted I think the namespace should be > > > clarified just as it is on the website so that ActiveMQ "Classic" uses > > > "apache/activemq/classic" and ActiveMQ Artemis uses > > > "apache/activemq/artemis". > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > Justin > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/4cqbm0gsbj184vrp13yorcd2rrbdcsmx > > > [2] https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/activemq/tags > > > > >
