Awesome. Glad it helps. Let me know if there is anything else I can do. I'm still struggling with some test failures on another (faster) CI I'm using.Not related to my changes because it happens on other branches. When I can get that sorted out I should be able to move forward faster. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com
On Fri, Dec 5, 2025 at 6:02 PM Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jean-Louis- > > Thank you! This is awesome. I will start assigning The first 3 PRs to me > for Review-Approve-Merge this weekend. > > I have a minor fix for your changes to the SendDuplicateFromStoreTest > (your test fix is more preferrable than mine since you are using the wait > util) > > I also just kicked a Jenkins for AMQ-9809, so we can hopefully get that > one green. > > Thanks! > Matt Pavlovich > > > On Dec 4, 2025, at 4:03 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I've been working on some PRs and would like to give a status on them. > > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1536 > > --> Fixes a dead lock with CRON schedules and a test that got me to find > > the bug > > PR is pretty simple and it's green > > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1540 > > --> PR to introduce parallel executions for unit tests for activemq-stomp > > module > > Cuts the build from ~14min to 1min20 > > There are many files touched, but they are very very simple (add the > > category so tests are executed in the right profile). I spent time > > reviewing tests and flagging the ones that could run in parallel. > > PR is green > > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1541 > > Similar to previous one but for activemq-mqtt > > Cuts the build from ~21min to ~3min > > It's also green > > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1544 > > Again similar to stomp and mqtt but for amqp and kahadb store > > As opposed to the 2 previous ones, the gain isn't as big, because most of > > the tests would need to be rewritten. Still amqp time divided by 2 and > > kahadb-store not significant because it uses a lot of IO and IO is slow > on > > Jenkins. > > It's green as well though. > > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1555 > > This one is a simple fix and quick to review. That test takes about an > hour > > on Jenkins to do something useless that isn't used in the tests. > > Brings the execution time just for this test from an hour to a few > minutes > > It's green as well. > > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1542 > > I'm actively working on this one because this is the one burning more > than > > 50% of the build time. > > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1537 > > Pretty simple, but build stopped and I can't trigger a new one, so can't > do > > anything more on this one. > > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1539 > > Test very slow, reviewed and merged 2 days ago I think. Thank you > > > > I have another one or two pending/draft that I will be working on later. > > As soon as it's all stable and we can reliably validate any refactoring > or > > change with Jenkins within a reasonable time (less than 7 hours), I'll > > return to Java 25 support. > > > > I started a branch to also start looking at JUnit upgrade from 3 to JUnit > > 5/6 > > > > Hope it helps > > Let me know if there is anything wrong with them or if you'd like me to > > focus on something else. > > > > -- > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact > > >
