Hi folks, Since a -1 only acts as a veto for code modifications, this vote is considered a governance and procedural matter. Therefore, it follows a simple majority rule.
The final results are: +1: 9 votes -1: 1 vote Based on this result, I propose we move forward with the migration from Jira to GitHub Issues following the ActiveMQ 6.2.1 release. Regards, JB On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 7:56 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > Following our previous discussions, I am calling a formal vote on the > proposal to migrate from Jira to GitHub Issues. > > This topic has been discussed extensively over the past few months. For > context, please review the following threads outlining the pros and cons: > > - https://lists.apache.org/thread/w3cl57zs7xmhk38mpzygp29whmmdbjkw > - https://lists.apache.org/thread/zqp72y8jpsc4q9g9z4skxjyozxs8gr8r > - https://lists.apache.org/thread/9ryfs0y8gnl2z4o2d7q646ffdrs9zzcp > - https://lists.apache.org/thread/93v6b5xxmthsypcwgvhotsmm4y2whdkm > - > https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-website/wiki/Apache-ActiveMQ-GitHub-Issues-Migration-Review > > I would like to gauge the community's support on this topic. Please cast > your vote on the adoption of GitHub Issues instead of Jira: > > [ ] +1 Approve: Migrate to GitHub Issues. > [ ] 0 Neutral: I don't care, or I will abstain. > [ ] -1 Disapprove: Do not approve the migration (Please provide specific > reasons for your objection). > > The vote will remain open for the next 72 hours. > > Thanks, > Regards > JB >
