shinhanbyeol commented on issue #52: URL: https://github.com/apache/age-website/issues/52#issuecomment-1221656823
> Nice job! The new website looks a lot more inviting. > > General remarks / questions: > > * For issues, Jira is mentioned, while in practice, I think currently most new issues by new members of the community are created in Github. Should Github be mentioned instead of Jira? Should one of the 2 issue trackers be closed in favor of the other? > * For the code review process, currently a review process using e-mail and patches is described (https://github.com/apache/age-website/blob/new-web/src/pages/contribution/guide.md#code-review-process). Wouldn't it be easier to use Github Pull Requests instead of patches in e-mails? > * Will the documentation pages be generated using Gatsby as well? (currently, the documentation link links to a non-existing page). I think a link to the documentation in the footer could be practical as well. > * Some icons / elements are quite big, but of course that is a personal preference. > > I've encountered some typos and missing links as well, but I think it's best to address those in a PR once the general discussion has concluded. “Apache AGE Manual” items in the documentation menu will utilize the same resources as https://age.apache.org/docs/master/index.html -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@age.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
