Hi Pertejan,

Currently this is not the case. However, in the future new versions might
have more features than older versions.

I'll support the following

   1. for PG 11, AGE_11_1.1.0
   2. for PG 12, AGE_12_1.1.0


Kind regards
Shoaib

On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 9:52 AM Pieterjan De Potter
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Everyone,
>
> I too think it would be nice to have similar version numbering for
> similar feature sets.
>
> One question that could make this impossible though: will there be
> future features that will only be implemented for some versions of
> Postgres (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, ...) because of underlying features
> supported by those particular Postgres versions? Or would that at that
> point be a reason to stop support for Postgres versions that don't
> support these underlying features?
>
> Kind regards,
> Pieterjan
>
>
> On 29.09.22 21:23, Jasper Blues wrote:
> > I think it should be versioned after the main development/R&D version.
> >
> > *Reasons: *
> > *
> > *
> >
> >   * It is easy to tie back to what this version was based off, without
> >     looking up an index (which could be prone to error).
> >   * If there is an as yet unfixed edge case bug affecting some portion
> >     of users on a particular version+pgVersion, they may have some
> >     confidence about what up/downgrade version to try should they also
> >     want to up/downgrade Postgres.
> >   * Simplicity : It is one of the core XP values along with
> >     communication, feedback, courage and respect.
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Sep 30, 2022, at 5:18 AM, Eya Badal <[email protected]
> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear Everyone,
> >>
> >> We are planning on our first release of Apache AGE for Postgres 12. It
> >> will be based on the Apache AGE 1.1.0 release that supports Postgres
> >> 11. There will be a prefix for this release and all Postgres 12
> >> supported releases.
> >>
> >> However, since this is the first Postgres 12 release, should the
> >> version be 1.0.0 or 1.1.0 because it is based on the 1.1.0 release for
> >> Postgres 11?
> >>
> >> Please share your thoughts and suggestions.
> >>
> >> Thank you very much,
> >> Eya
> >
>
>

Reply via email to