I33Buckler commented on issue #1260: URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1260#issuecomment-1753939543
> @I33Buckler I think what I meant to say was, if it fails at `row_num` **7741** what happens if you have it run to **7740** and then start the next run from **7741** to **7741+7740** and increments of **7740** there afterwards? Sorry for the confusion. The issue is actually at row 123486. The previous instance was identified as 7741 because I matched by service_key rather than row number so the processed table was not sorted to match 1:1 with the table **temprow**. After ensuring 1:1 row match between **temprow** and **allservices.trips** it was discovered that the actual row number effected was 123486. As noted at https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1260#issuecomment-1751540744 splitting the table up to row 123486 resulted in successful processing. It was when row 123487 was introduced into the AGE graph table that the error occured. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@age.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
