> Just wondering, can we use JMS to provide API support ? > A native AMQP API is more powerful than JMS. JMS would be option 2.
> IMO, it does matter. I have seen people getting into trouble when they > using wrong AMQP implementations in their applications. If you > carefully google it, you will see many articles. There are certain > parameters which we need to be concern about when selecting a proper > AMQP implementation. I would also like to know what those parameters > are. We are fine with any AMQP implementation as long as it is compliant with the specification. Naturally, there could be issues in implementation level. Lets go for RabbitMQ and see how it fits in. Thanks, Danushka
