Hi I think keeping in mind the current implementation of the Xbaya, it would be good if we stick to single page web app with each of us having our custom modules.We all can come up with a design which can be used for all the interfaces, it will save the amount of time spend for designing a page from scratch.
Regards Sanchit Aggarwal On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Subho Banerjee <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > I had one small query, are all of us (those working on the front end) > working on a single page web app. > > Or will each of us have a page which we will design form top to bottom. > > In any case, maybe we can also agree on some common format to reuse the > objects, so that we do not code replication. > > Cheers, > Subho. > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Here are the all the proposals, please enable the public option, if you >> haven't previously: >> >> Dunushka - >> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/danushka/1 >> Subho - >> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/subhobanerjee/13001 >> Vijayendra - >> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/vijayendra_purohit/33001 >> Sanchit - >> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/sanchitaggarwal/24001 >> Shameera - >> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/shameera/60002 >> Viknes - >> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/vikbalas/1 >> >> Suresh >> >> >> On May 31, 2013, at 11:15 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Please check now. Sorry about that. >> > >> > Danushka >> > >> > >> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Danushka >> >> >> >> It seems that your proposal is not public. can you please set it to >> public. >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> Sanchit Aggarwal >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Vijayendra, >> >>> >> >>> That's great!. >> >>> >> >>> BTW where to get some insight into what you are trying to do in the >> first >> >>> place?. Maybe your proposal would do. >> >>> >> >>> Please find mine at [1]. Please go through sections 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 to >> >> get >> >>> a very high-level idea of what we are planning to do in terms of >> >> supporting >> >>> AMQP in WS-Messenger. >> >>> >> >>> [1] - >> >>> >> >> >> https://google-melange.appspot.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/danushka/1 >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> Danushka >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Vijayendra Grampurohit < >> >>> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Hi Dhanushka/All >> >>>> >> >>>> I will be involved in one of the sub-project under "Monitoring and >> >>>> Messaging". As you are handling "AMQP Messaging protocol support for >> >>>> Airavata WS-Messenger", We need to come up with framework for message >> >>>> monitoring. Can we all start discussing here? >> >>>> >> >>>> Regards >> >>>> Vijayendra >> >>>> >> >> >> >>
