+1 for GIT, mainly beacuse : - gives individual better local version control, changes can be easily push back into central repo. - SVN merge are complicated and error prone, as compared to git which are less messy and simple.
Regards Sanchit Aggarwal On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Marlon Pierce <[email protected]> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I'd really like to here from the GSOC students and others on the list > without SVN write access. Would you find things easier if you could > easily do a git fork? > > > Marlon > > On 9/20/13 3:31 PM, Suresh Marru wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > One of the items we briefly listed on roadmap [1] is deciding on a SCM > which can go forward. Do we have any strong opinions on SVN Vs GIT? Just > starting a discussion. > > > > Suresh > > [1] - http://markmail.org/thread/5nq7jfk5b7izbip3 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) > Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSPLG6AAoJEOEgD2XReDo5v1oH/RViy7qNDQgUmKcxlSM8Yi7d > f4DFRRG8JzP2QWotwUhkBGSYEPUgyVizg5JNzOxUGRFcTTRsz5GXV3ihursAM+6L > 4OKJE9jTy3PMKOWjqdYRlpieDs3JbR9omc+Vkb1dOBkfgnS7xNBjPNxtlKheO+K3 > OrjivVKgBdJCu+R3fSGmNfN0X1BGwfPEob8MeMV9prXaXKcl+1MuV175R+hB5eMO > dgBoJc4tTr6je4l2JF7+xXj/DvpXpJys44++NUOdS1LjfX5PC/rUtYqcgIsowj3n > Xck7n77KaqRByUbs8lG/yGTYm1sY3fSwZUTt2XihmWPZQaOJaky/2CbEDGH8RNQ= > =t71P > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
