Earlier we were able to log into the system using private key. But now it asks for a password. I think our keys have been removed. My public key is ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAADAQABAAABAQDH9Lzx8u7Bhi8GIQEBk5a9k6UROa26 OM2QawLSIHqdwwW15C8J493/jmdOsA9MuE4IXR3oVhlhkwJJhvJHap llasaMGsED7pCltrRgumY8Tp/YKPYnUZCwt7CxzOlDh2dgq7wBn4bgwhC6/FDfYxpOeauhbaY+ rqfo1V8I62pgC8Nmb6iNHKqQBts+QRYrs0FvPwlKqD8fZeYnm8+NVvKi/ R9oDb1uwBGnxymAz1ks0yYtmGn6M5xggQFu+OdfrWOrXpVQh+RzjcGiafrJmHpeAH+ vhX7uxe0bRDqv59iZRCKVDrMN2UDpNH8fBGTLivL2LLNl0IZ08m72hQ5Xum7v supun.nakand...@gmail.com
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Pamidighantam, Sudhakar V < spami...@illinois.edu> wrote: > Suresh is traveling. What issues are you facing. I have root access on > this system. > Let me see if I can help there. > > Thanks, > Sudhakar. > > On Dec 11, 2014, at 10:29 AM, Supun Nakandala <supun.nakand...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Sudhakar, > > Thank you very much for your support. Suresh gave us a machine( > gridchem.uits.iu.edu) in IU to deploy the server. But unfortunately we > are having some ssh issues when logging to that server . I will contact > Suresh and get the issue fixed and deploy an instance of the server there > so that you can configure and test the parsers by your self. > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Pamidighantam, Sudhakar V < > spami...@illinois.edu> wrote: > >> Supun: >> I support these goals. I am available for you to engage with you and >> anything I can do to expedite the project please let me know. Even if you >> think I can not, do please ask anyway. >> I have written the original parsers in perl myself and have directed >> others when the Cup/JFLex system was put in place. I have generated and >> modified the CUP/JFlex code before, so I am familiar with how it works. I >> will look at the paper and may suggest additions. >> >> I can not test the system now by adding more data and see if this can >> parse the new data. How can we get to that point. This is critical first >> step for me before I can ask friendly users to test this further. Current >> state is a prototype only and is not interesting enough for any of our >> users. Unless we can add parsing of more data and more salient data and >> create products it is difficult engage end users in any meaningful way. >> >> Perhaps if this is deployed somewhere in Indiana it may be easier to >> move forward. If you need more data please let me know where I should >> locate it for you to access. >> >> Thanks, >> Sudhakar. >> >> >> On Dec 11, 2014, at 4:11 AM, Supun Nakandala <supun.nakand...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> We had the mid evaluation of the project last Tuesday and the following >> concerns were raised. >> >> 1. The lack of visibility of the overall solution in the project >> demonstration. >> 2. The ability to come up with a solution where, scientist who does >> not have a background in computer science can create new parsers (metadata >> extraction logic) >> >> The project was demonstrated using the web interface that we developed. >> For the final evaluation we expect to demonstrate the system using laravel >> PHP Reference Gateway running in a production server and demonstrate how a >> new data product that gets generated will be identified, indexed and will >> be available for searching and hope this will handle the first issue. >> >> We also had a meeting with Dr. Dilum our internal supervisor where we >> identified things that can be done from now to 15th January, the expected >> project completion date >> >> 1. Do a proper performance test and publish a paper before final >> marks for the project is finalized (marks will be finalized by the end of >> March). >> 2. Getting to work more parsers, so that Sudhakar can ask more users >> to use the system. This will help to get more feedback on the system and >> have a real world usage. >> 3. Implement the support for provenance aware workflow execution in >> Airavata using our system. >> >> We have written a draft paper which I have attached here with. We showed >> this to Dr. Srinath and Dr Dilum and they suggested that we do a proper >> performance testing (The one that already done is not up to the expected >> standards). Given the available time we need to prioritize our work and >> select a set of tasks that is doable and has the most impact. What do you >> all think? >> >> Draft Paper: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PLfST6hLygQpsr4RlgiDoffmDEwMOWbmb1WZ0uKTtd8/edit#heading=h.6fjqfavj2nov >> >> Literature Review: >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0cLF-CLa59oaXRBazF1aURvQTg/view?usp=sharing >> >> Supun >> >> >> > > > -- > Thank you > Supun Nakandala > Dept. Computer Science and Engineering > University of Moratuwa > > > -- Thank you Supun Nakandala Dept. Computer Science and Engineering University of Moratuwa
