You can also think of the first step as a JavaFX version of the PGA. You should look first at the regular user parts rather than the admin interface in the PGA. You could always use the PGA to manage resources and applications, but then connect to the same Airavata server via your workflow desktop composer.
From: marpierc <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 2:05 PM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: GSOC proposal Start with the UI and show how you will map to the API. Identity management is also an important problem for desktop apps to remote services. From: Bikramjeet Singh <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: GSOC proposal Hello sir, Is it the UI part or the API implementation that needs to be detailed? Thanks On Tuesday, March 22, 2016, Pierce, Marlon <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Bikramjeet, Thanks for your interest. Your current proposal lacks a lot of detail, and I’m concerned if you will be able to accomplish it. You should take a look, if you haven’t at another JavaFX project that builds on the Apache Airavata API: https://github.com/SciGaP/seagrid-rich-client This will give you more of an idea about what you will need to do. You can use this to strengthen your proposal. Note this client does not include workflow support, so you’ll need to go beyond the SEAGrid client. Marlon From: Bikramjeet Singh <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>" <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> Date: Monday, March 21, 2016 at 12:19 PM To: Airavata Dev <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> Subject: Re: GSOC proposal Hello, Yes sir I granted commenting permissions. Thanks On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Pierce, Marlon <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: Hi Bikramjeet, Your proposal is a good start. I would like to make some comments inline in the google doc. Thanks, Marlon From: Bikramjeet Singh <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>" <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> Date: Thursday, March 17, 2016 at 3:08 PM To: Airavata Dev <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> Subject: Re: GSOC proposal Hi, I've shared the draft through Gsoc application, kindly review it. Thanks On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: Can you start the doc in gsoc application itself and choose google doc for draft? Suresh > On Mar 17, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Bikramjeet Singh > <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> > wrote: > > Hi, > I have a GSOC draft proposal ready, where should I share it for review and > will the google doc link work? > > Thanks, > Bikramjeet Singh
