Amila, Thanks Amila for explaining. It really explains how things are mapped. I could see output against JOB but could not figure out from where exactly we are logging output for a process.
Shameera, Yeah, that's true. So basically, if application does not have output staging task, it would not log output for respective process. Which means if output data type is not URI, we are not logging output against process.(Please correct me if I am wrong). Probably, here we have an opportunity to improve. Thanks in anticipation On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Shameera Rathnayaka <shameerai...@gmail.com > wrote: > Hi Ajinkya, > > If you check here > org.apache.airavata.gfac.impl.task.SCPDataStageTask#outputDataStaging > you will see that we are saving process outputs to database(through > registry). You probably testing with local job submission > with org.apache.airavata.gfac.impl.task.DataStageTask as data staging > task implementation. There we don't save process outputs. First thing is > to fix this and save the process outputs to the database. > > If you know the JobId then you can retrieve processId from Job model. > Using processId you can get all process outputs. see PROCES_OUTPUT case in > org.apache.airavata.registry.core.experiment.catalog.impl. > ExperimentCatalogImpl#get(..,..) method. > > Hope this will help you to move forward. > > Best, > Shameera. > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:48 PM Amila Jayasekara <thejaka.am...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Ajinkya, >> >> I am not familiar with the context of your question but let me try to >> answer. >> >> If you are referring to an application deployed in a supercomputer, then >> the application should have a job id. In the supercomputer, each >> application runs as a separate batch job and each job is distinguished >> using the job id (similar to process id in a PC). Usually, the job >> scheduler returns this job id and Airavata should be aware about that job >> id. Then, you should be able to use this job id to identify the output, >> provided job script specify instructions to generate output. >> >> I did not understand what you referred as "process model" and "job >> model". I assume these are database tables. >> >> Thanks >> -Amila >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Ajinkya Dhamnaskar < >> adham...@umail.iu.edu> wrote: >> >> Hello Dev, >> >> I am trying to fetch application output (type:INTEGER) after experiment >> completion. As per my understanding each application runs as a process and >> that process should have final output. >> >> So, ideally we should be able to get final output from process id itself >> (correct me if I am wrong). >> In my case, I am not seeing final output in database. Basically, we are >> not updating process model after job completion, we update job model >> though. >> >> Am I missing anything here? >> >> Any help is appreciated. >> >> -- >> Thanks and regards, >> >> Ajinkya Dhamnaskar >> Student ID : 0003469679 >> Masters (CS) >> +1 (812) 369- 5416 <(812)%20369-5416> >> >> >> -- > Shameera Rathnayaka > -- Thanks and regards, Ajinkya Dhamnaskar Student ID : 0003469679 Masters (CS) +1 (812) 369- 5416
