Hi Dimuthu,

Thanks for cleaning things up!  However, I'm pretty sure we're still using 
db-event-manager to manage our event-based synchronization between Airavata 
services.

The rest looks good to be removed though.

Thanks,

Marcus

> On Dec 10, 2018, at 1:08 AM, DImuthu Upeksha <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Folks,
> 
> I removed following modules on staging branch [1] and created a separate 
> branch named archive to keep old changes. 
> 
> allocation-manager
> cloud
> db-event-manager
> gfac
> integration-tests
> monitoring
> test-suite
> workflow
> workflow-model
> xbaya
> xbaya-gui
> 
> Following modules were kept as there are some dependencies to other modules
> 
> compute-account-provisioning
> configuration
> security
> 
> Updated repository was tested in the Testing environment and everything seems 
> to be running smoothly. I will redeploy Staging setup in few days and merge 
> changes to develop branch as well.
> 
> Thanks 
> Dimuthu
> 
> [1] https://github.com/apache/airavata/tree/staging/modules 
> <https://github.com/apache/airavata/tree/staging/modules>
> 
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 8:32 PM Suresh Marru <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hi Sudhakar,
> 
> The allocation manager from last year contributions is here - 
> https://github.com/apache/airavata-sandbox/tree/master/allocation-manager 
> <https://github.com/apache/airavata-sandbox/tree/master/allocation-manager> 
> the one Dimuthu is suggesting to clean up is a stale one. 
> 
> I think we should turn the allocation manager into a larger goal of enforcing 
> quotas mainly for user storage and probably take on as soon as possible. 
> 
> Cheers,
> Suresh
> 
>> On Nov 30, 2018, at 8:37 AM, Pamidighantam, Sudhakar V 
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> What is the estimated timeline for enforceable allocation management to be 
>> available in Airavata, 2019, 2020?
>>  
>> Thanks,
>> Sudhakar.
>>  
>> From: DImuthu Upeksha <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Reply-To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" 
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Date: Friday, November 30, 2018 at 8:30 AM
>> To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" 
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Subject: Re: Unused modules
>>  
>> Hi Suresh,
>>  
>> +1 for removing gfac modules as well 
>>  
>> Dimuthu
>>  
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 6:32 PM Apache Airavata <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> +1 to remove all of them. While you are at it, should we also remove gfac 
>> modules from develop and staging branches?
>>  
>> Suresh
>>  
>> 
>> On Nov 30, 2018, at 6:44 AM, DImuthu Upeksha <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Folks, 
>>  
>> I can see that some modules [1] are no longer being used or actively 
>> developed. 
>>  
>> allocation-manager
>> cloud
>> compute-account-provisioning
>> configuration
>> db-event-manager
>> integration-tests
>> monitoring
>> security
>> workflow
>> workflow-model
>> xbaya
>> xbaya-gui
>>  
>> I'm suggesting to remove these unused modules as they affect the build time 
>> and the clarity of the code. Any objections / suggestions?
>>  
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/airavata/tree/staging/modules 
>> <https://github.com/apache/airavata/tree/staging/modules>
>>  
>> Thanks
>> Dimuthu
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to