Hi Dimuthu, We have now addressed all the issues raised. Could you please verify and provide your inputs.
Regards, Nikita From: DImuthu Upeksha<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 1:49 AM To: Airavata Dev<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [External] Re: Airavata MFT- Gdrive transport implementation Still there are some unaddressed reviews available. Please have a look at them. [2] https://github.com/apache/airavata-mft/pull/11/files On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 1:33 AM Patil, Aniruddha Vivek <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hello Dimuthu, We addressed the changes suggested in your review. Please let us know what should be addressed further. Thanks and regards, Aniruddha Patil On Apr 28, 2020, at 10:05 PM, DImuthu Upeksha <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Thanks. I did the first pass of you PR. Please have a look. Once you address the issues, I will do more detailed reviews. Dimuthu On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 6:22 PM Bafna, Nikita <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hello Dimuthu, Sorry I forgot to mention the PR [1] link. Here it is. [1] https://github.com/apache/airavata-mft/pull/11 Regards, Nikita From: Bafna, Nikita<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 4:39 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [External] Re: Airavata MFT- Gdrive transport implementation Hello Dimuthu, We have implemented transport system for Google drive. We have build our transport in a way where if a file with that name already exists it will update that file instead of creating a new one on Google drive. For now we have tested our implementation between endpoints below. S3 to Google drive Google drive to S3 Local to Google drive (Screenshot attached) Google drive to Local (Screenshot attached) Could you please have a look and let us know your feedback. Thank you, Team NSA (Nikita Bafna, Shivali Jejurkar, Aniruddha Patil) ________________________________ From: Bafna, Nikita Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 5:20 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [External] Re: Airavata MFT- Gdrive transport implementation Hi Dimuthu, During testing of the GDrive transport, we came across a situation where if a file is being uploaded on the Gdrive and if the file with same name already exists, then Gdrive creates a new file with the same name (it creates a new version ). So how should this be handled? Should it create a new file or update the existing file? Let us know your inputs. Regards, Nikita ________________________________ From: Bafna, Nikita <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 12:48 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [External] Re: Airavata MFT- Gdrive transport implementation Okay. Thanks for the inputs Dimuthu. From: DImuthu Upeksha <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 3:05 AM To: Airavata Dev <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [External] Re: Airavata MFT- Gdrive transport implementation Go with service account approach as this is service to service authentication Dimuthu On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 7:11 PM Bafna, Nikita <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Dimuthu, While working for Google drive transport, we are wondering what kind of credential account should we use for our setup. Attaching the options available. Could you please provide your feedback. Regards, Nikita ________________________________ From: Suresh Marru <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 11:36 PM To: Airavata Dev Subject: [External] Re: Airavata MFT- Gdrive transport implementation This message was sent from a non-IU address. Please exercise caution when clicking links or opening attachments from external sources. A big kudos for all the work on transports, these are nicely evolving. We do not need to drive these with IU decisions, but good point these will lead to potential use cases. On that note, looks like Google Drive will be used for non-sensitive data and one drive for PHI data. So an eventual plan for MFT to support both will be nice. I added it to the spreadsheet. Suresh On Apr 24, 2020, at 12:45 PM, DImuthu Upeksha <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Because of the IUs decision of migration of Box data to Google Drive, I expect the use cases will come into MFT to handle drive transports. So from the usability perspective, I'd prefer gdrive over one drive. But it's up to you to decide. Once you have finalized on one, please update it in [1] [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M7-Reda-pCi1l-TSSstI6Yi1pSbtINUqlBFcy5UrOW0/edit#gid=0 On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 11:43 AM Jejurkar, Shivali <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hello Dimuthu, I have set up MFT locally and was able to transfer file from S3 to S3 and S3 to local. I am interested in implementing Gdrive transfers. Would MFT also extend support for other cloud storage platforms like OneDrive? Can you share your feedback or any challenges that you see if my team pick Gdrive and Onedrive up? Thanks, Shivali
