Hey David - any comments on that ?

On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 1:07 PM Elad Kalif <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for raising this discussion.
> following the protocol established about accepting new providers -
>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/PROVIDERS.rst#accepting-new-community-providers
> My main concern here is how will provide ongoing mantaince for this
> provider?
> This provider is to handle a service by Microsoft yet Microsoft is not in
> the picture here (as far as I can see)
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 12:39 PM Blain David <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I've already started a discussion about this on the Airflow discussions:
> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/36315
> >
> > As we have multiple DAG's interacting with MS Graph API endpoints, and as
> > we want to avoid custom code as much as possible as we have to handle
> lot's
> > of data due to paging.
> > We thought of implementing an operator for it using the official python
> > client from Microsoft<
> https://github.com/microsoftgraph/msgraph-sdk-python>,
> > that way we can simplify our DAGs and remove custom code as much as
> > possible.
> > That's why we implemented an MSGraph SDK Provider which is on GitHub<
> > https://github.com/infrabel/apache-airflow-providers-msgraph> and also
> > published it as an artifact on PyPi<
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-msgraph/>.
> >
> > As Jarek pointed out in the pull request for Third Party providers<
> > https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/933>, it's not a good idea
> to
> > use the apache-airflow prefix for the library as it is not maintained by
> > the Apache community (yet).
> > So there are 2 options, or we change the name or we donate the project to
> > the Apache Airflow community, which I think the later one is the best
> > option if there is interest to do it, hence why I also started a
> discussion<
> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/36315> about it a few
> weeks
> > ago on GitHub<https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/36315>.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > David
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to