need 1 more binding vote

On Sat, Sep 27, 2025 at 7:08 PM Elad Kalif <[email protected]> wrote:

> standard provider will be excluded from this wave
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 1:59 AM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Jed took care of it: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/56109 first
>>
>> On Thu, 25 Sept 2025 at 23:52, Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > @j_scheffler <[email protected]> Yeah I noticed similar failure on
>> > different things too. https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/56118
>> fixes
>> > it & adds compat layer test now that 3.1.0 is released
>> >
>> > On Thu, 25 Sept 2025 at 23:01, Jens Scheffler <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package
>> build,
>> >> Licenses, Signatures
>> >>
>> >> Tested providers (especially Edge) in Breeze with latest main, and
>> 3.0.6
>> >> - These look good.
>> >>
>> >> But testing with brand new released 3.1.0 fail in all examples being
>> >> parsed - assume it is related to standard provider:
>> >>
>> >> Therefore I'd -1 to standard provider release.
>> >>
>> >> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> >>    File
>> >>
>> "/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/airflow/serialization/serialized_objects.py",
>> >> line 1135, in detect_task_dependencies
>> >>      from airflow.providers.standard.sensors.external_task import
>> >> ExternalTaskSensor
>> >>    File
>> >>
>> "/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/airflow/providers/standard/sensors/external_task.py",
>> >> line 55, in <module>
>> >>      from airflow.dag_processing.dagbag import DagBag
>> >> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'airflow.dag_processing.dagbag'
>> >>
>> >> On 25.09.25 13:13, Blain David wrote:
>> >> > +1 approve for me
>> >> >
>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > From: Elad Kalif<[email protected]>
>> >> > Sent: 25 September 2025 10:24
>> >> > To:[email protected]
>> >> > Subject: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 25, 2025
>> >> >
>> >> > EXTERNAL MAIL: Indien je de afzender van deze e-mail niet kent en
>> deze
>> >> niet vertrouwt, klik niet op een link of open geen bijlages. Bij
>> twijfel,
>> >> stuur deze e-mail als bijlage [email protected]<mailto:
>> >> [email protected]>.
>> >> >
>> >> > Hey all,
>> >> >
>> >> > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email
>> is
>> >> calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which
>> means
>> >> that it will end on September 28, 2025 08:20 AM UTC and until 3
>> binding +1
>> >> votes have been received.
>> >> >
>> >> > Consider this my (binding) +1.
>> >> >
>> >> > Airflow Providers are available at:
>> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
>> >> >
>> >> > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary  Python
>> >> "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the Provider
>> >> distributions.
>> >> >
>> >> > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary  Python
>> >> "wheel" release.
>> >> >
>> >> > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
>> >> >
>> >>
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
>> >> >
>> >> > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this
>> RC
>> >> is described in:
>> >> >
>> >>
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Public keys are available at:
>> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>> >> >
>> >> > Please vote accordingly:
>> >> >
>> >> > [ ] +1 approve
>> >> > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> >> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>> >> >
>> >> > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
>> >> are encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>> >> >
>> >> > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
>> >> > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying the
>> >> artifact checksums when we actually release.
>> >> >
>> >> > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
>> >> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/56091
>> >> >
>> >> > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in
>> the
>> >> RC candidates.
>> >> > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
>> >> documentation after the RC candidates are released.
>> >> >
>> >> > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
>> >> >
>> >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-celery/3.12.4rc1/
>> >> >
>> >>
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/10.8.2rc1/
>> >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-edge3/1.3.1rc1/
>> >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/2.4.4rc1/
>> >> >
>> >>
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-psrp/3.1.4rc1/
>> >> >
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openlineage/2.7.2rc1/
>> >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-smtp/2.3.1rc1/
>> >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-standard/1.9.0rc1/
>> >> >
>> >> > Cheers,
>> >> > Elad Kalif
>> >> >
>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:[email protected]
>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail:[email protected]
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to