All stuff is in master (I'm running pre-production on master), if it needs
to be cherry-picked to a branch I can always test it. I would be grate if
it's in the next release so I can start blogging about it.

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 8:05 PM Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> (Sorry for the late response, I was on holiday)
>
> I think the G* operators just need to be cherry picked. This will make us
> deviate slightly from the
> previous release, but makes sure we don’t have to ‘fix’ history afterwards.
>
> Anyone against this?
>
> - B.
>
> > Op 8 aug. 2016, om 14:21 heeft Alex Van Boxel <a...@vanboxel.be> het
> volgende geschreven:
> >
> > Sorry, Bolke. What needs to be done for Google Cloud operators/hooks?
> >
> > If you bring me up-to-speed I can do this. I'm currently working an a CI
> > setup for the Google stuff).
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 3:56 PM Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I have indeed a branch with cherry picked commits. This branch is
> >> available in the apache repo. The branch is available as
> >> “branch-1.7.2-apache”. What is left to do is to decide weather we do
> >> upgrade the google cloud operators/hooks as part of this release as the
> >> licenses were only added after these changes came in. I prefer this
> >> approach as we stay away from custom commits as much as possible then.
> >>
> >> - Bolke
> >>
> >>> Op 5 aug. 2016, om 00:21 heeft Gurer Kiratli <gurer.kira...@airbnb.com
> .INVALID>
> >> het volgende geschreven:
> >>>
> >>> Agenda
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  -
> >>>
> >>>  Committers sync-up: progress and plans
> >>>  -
> >>>
> >>>     Max to do a recap since last release
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>     Airbnb
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>     Anyone else?
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>  Cooperation Best Practices
> >>>  -
> >>>
> >>>  Solicit for feedback for Impersonation Design Review
> >>>  -
> >>>
> >>>  Release Schedule, Management
> >>>  -
> >>>
> >>>  Roadmap discussion
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Attendees: Jeremiah Lowin, Chris Riccomini, Andrew Phillips(?), Maxime
> >>> Beauchemin, Paul Yang, Dan Davydov, Xuanji Li, George Ke, Arthur
> Wiedmer,
> >>> Gurer Kiratli
> >>>
> >>> Notes
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  -
> >>>
> >>>  Recap for the overall project
> >>>  -
> >>>
> >>>     [Max]
> >>>
> >> https://gist.github.com/mistercrunch/5460483ec764e2a1cb816c6b1d6ad5a3
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>  Airbnb Recap
> >>>  -
> >>>
> >>>     [Paul] Airbnb is continuing work on features related to migrating
> >>>     more jobs onto Airflow - DB connection scalability, impersonation,
> >>>     refreshing web UI, DAG git versioning, task resource isolation
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>  Other Recaps
> >>>  -
> >>>
> >>>     [Chris] Improvements to Import functionality. Joy did some work
> >>>     around CLIs and mark success in collaboration with Bolke.
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>     [Jeremiah] Came up with the Merge tool. Focusing on the work around
> >>>     configuration.
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>  Meeting cadence
> >>>  -
> >>>
> >>>     [Max] We can have monthly meetings. Let’s start with monthly we can
> >>>     change the cadence. We should invite all contributors. We should
> >>> specify in
> >>>     the invite that everyone is welcome. Currently posting this on
> >>> the mailing
> >>>     list and wiki.
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>     *Action Item*  Gurer to schedule monthly meetings next one at
> >> Airbnb.
> >>>     Airbnb is welcoming folks to come onsite
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>  Blog/Documentation
> >>>  -
> >>>
> >>>     [Max, Chris, Jeremiah] Having a blog would be useful. We can
> >>>     structure our thoughts.
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>     [Andrew] Blog should have better language with screenshots and all.
> >>>     This raises the level of effort bar and this might mean that
> >>> nobody really
> >>>     does it.
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>     [Max] Maybe use Medium? We can try it out.
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>     [Max] Haven’t looked at the documentation for a long time. I don’t
> >>>     really know about its quality.
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>     [Arthur] Looking at the email list responses, seems like the
> >>>     documentation is missing certain elements.
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>     [Max] Maybe we can interview people who just started and identify
> >>>     gaps.
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>     *Action Item* [Jeremiah] We can also ask the mailing list about
> >> this.
> >>>     He will send this out.
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>  Cooperation guidelines
> >>>  -
> >>>
> >>>     [Max, Arthur]
> >>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Community+Guidelines
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>     [Chris] Let’s link the guidelines to contributor md . This should
> be
> >>>     discoverable
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>  Release
> >>>  -
> >>>
> >>>     [Chris, Max] Bolke might have branch with High charts and Licensing
> >>>     cherry picked. We can use this as a dry run. We can test the
> >> process.
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>     [Max] Big release is probably around September.
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>     [Andrew] If we want to have a true practice, we need to be
> >> diligently
> >>>     following Apache guidelines.
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>     [Max] We might want to revive the email thread about how we should
> >> do
> >>>     this.
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>     [Chris] It would be great for someone who hasn’t done this before
> to
> >>>     do this.
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>     [Andrew] Building a script for this is smart otherwise the manual
> >>>     work is painful from experience.
> >>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JCLOUDS/Releasing+jclouds
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JCLOUDS/Validate+a+Release
> >>>
> >>>  -
> >>>
> >>>     *Action Item* [Max] Max will own this. This will happen by 08/19.
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>     [Arthur] For the main release around mid September. We need to
> >>>     confirm this date.
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>  Roadmap
> >>>  -
> >>>
> >>>     [Max] Maybe each company puts their own section? Or should we have
> a
> >>>     more cohesive roadmap?
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>     *Action Item* Gurer to schedule a roadmap discussion
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>  Misc
> >>>  -
> >>>
> >>>     [Max] For executor thinking about sticking with Celery and maybe
> >>>     having Docker implemented on top of it.
> >>>     -
> >>>
> >>>     [Max] We might want to explore Sphinx for generating documentation
> >>>     from code.
> >>>     - [Max] Please review the impersonation design review. This is
> >> pretty
> >>>     simple and reversible.
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to