The following three JIRAs were not merged into the v1-8-test branch, but are listed as part of the 1.8.1 release:
AIRFLOW-1017 b2b9587cca9195229ab107394ad94b7702c70e37 AIRFLOW-906 bc47200711be4d2c0b36b772651dae4f5e01a204 AIRFLOW-858 94dc7fb0a6bb3c563d9df6566cd52a59bd0c4629 AIRFLOW-832 b0ae70d3a8e935dc9266b6853683ae5375a7390b I'm going to merge them in now. On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Bolke, > > Great. Assuming your PR is committed, that leaves five blockers: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1000 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1001 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1013 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1018 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1019 > > I've also got a list of all open 1.8.1 JIRAs [1]. > > Cheers, > Chris > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% > 3D%20AIRFLOW%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In% > 20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.1 > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:59 PM, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Chris, >> >> I have a PR out for >> >> * Revert of 719, which makes 982 obsolete and removes 983 from the >> blockers list and just a new feature. >> >> See: https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2195 < >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2195> >> >> Cc: @alexvanboxel >> >> Bolke >> >> > On 24 Mar 2017, at 10:21, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hey all, >> > >> > I've let this thread sit for a while. Here are a list of the issues that >> > were raised: >> > >> > BLOCKERS: >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-982 >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-983 >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1019 >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1017 >> > >> > NICE TO HAVE: >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1015 >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1013 >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1004 >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1003 >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1001 >> > >> > It looks like AIRFLOW-1017 is done, though the JIRA is not closed. >> > >> > The rest remain open. I will wait on the release until the remaining >> > blockers are finished. Dan/Daniel, can you comment on status? >> > >> > Ruslan, if you want to work on your nice to haves, and submit patches, >> > that's great, otherwise I don't believe they'll get fixed as part of >> 1.8.1. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Chris >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Ruslan Dautkhanov < >> [email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Thank you Sid! >> >> >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Ruslan >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:01 AM, siddharth anand <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Ruslan, >> >>> Thanks for sharing this list. I can pick a few up. I agree we should >> aim >> >> to >> >>> get some of them into 1.8.1. >> >>> >> >>> -s >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Ruslan Dautkhanov < >> [email protected] >> >>> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Some of the issues I ran into while testing 1.8rc5 : >> >>>> >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1015 >> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1013 >> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1004 >> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1003 >> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1001 >> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1015 >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> It would be great to have at least some of them fixed in 1.8.1. >> >>>> >> >>>> Thank you. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> Ruslan Dautkhanov >> >>>> >> >>>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Dan Davydov <[email protected] >> . >> >>>> invalid >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Here is my list for targeted 1.8.1 fixes: >> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-982 >> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-983 >> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1019 (and in general >> >> the >> >>>>> slow >> >>>>> startup time from this new logic of orphaned/reset task) >> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1017 (which I will >> >>>> hopefully >> >>>>> have a fix out for soon just finishing up tests) >> >>>>> >> >>>>> We are also hitting a new issue with subdags with rc5 that we >> weren't >> >>>>> hitting with rc4 where subdags will occasionally just hang (had to >> >> roll >> >>>>> back from rc5 to rc4), I'll try to spin up a JIRA for it soon which >> >>>> should >> >>>>> be on the list too. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Chris Riccomini < >> >>> [email protected]> >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> Agreed. I'm looking for a list of checksums/JIRAs that we want in >> >> the >> >>>>>> bugfix release. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Bolke de Bruin < >> >> [email protected]> >> >>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On 21 Mar 2017, at 12:51, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> My suggestion, as we are using semantic versioning is: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> 1) no new features in the 1.8 branch >> >>>>>>>> 2) only bug fixes in the 1.8 branch >> >>>>>>>> 3) new features to land in 1.9 >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> This allows companies to >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Have a "known" version and can move to the new branch when they >> >>> want >> >>>> to >> >>>>>>> get new features. Obviously we only support N-1, so when 1.10 >> >> comes >> >>>> out >> >>>>>> we >> >>>>>>> stop supporting 1.8.X. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On 21 Mar 2017, at 11:22, Chris Riccomini < >> >>> [email protected]> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Hey all, >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> I suggest that we start a 1.8.1 Airflow release now. The goal >> >>>> would >> >>>>>> be: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> 1) get a second release under our belt >> >>>>>>>>> 2) patch known issues with the 1.8.0 release >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> I'm happy to run it, but I saw Maxime mentioning that Airbnb >> >>> might >> >>>>>> want >> >>>>>>> to. >> >>>>>>>>> @Max et al, can you comment? >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Also, can folks supply JIRAs for stuff that think needs to be >> >> in >> >>>> the >> >>>>>>> 1.8.1 >> >>>>>>>>> bugfix release? >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >> >>>>>>>>> Chris >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
