The artifact version has an rc6 in it. I suppose we need to re-vote. Sigh. On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ehmmmm > > Renaming the file is fine, but the artifacts inside should stay the same. > You cannot change what we voted on. So basically if the SHA/MD5 changes we > need to vote :-(. > > Tbh I did not look at the artifact description (version.py primarily, it > should have read 1.9.0). > > Have a look at the mailing list history and how Max did it last time, > because it changed a little bit, so I might be off a little. > > Cheers > Bolke > > Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > > > Op 15 dec. 2017 om 21:43 heeft Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org> > het volgende geschreven: > > > > Hey all, > > > > For 1.9.0, RC6 has passed the vote. Does anyone recall what the protocol > is > > for releasing it? I believe I need to re-build the artifacts to remove > the > > 'rc6' from the release. IIRC, we don't need to re-vote for this, do we? > > > > Cheers, > > Chris >
