- **status**: open --> review
- **Comment**:

Query removal in 
https://sourceforge.net/p/activitystream/code/ci/db/8006/~/tree/

Memory usage seems like it should be managed properly, at least from the Ming 
perspective.  We use the ming storage option for activitystream, and so the 
ming session gets registered globally, and all its ORM objects get cleaned up 
via `MingMiddleware` at the end of each request/task.  



---

** [tickets:#8006] Large timeline performance issue in activity stream**

**Status:** review
**Milestone:** unreleased
**Labels:** performance activitystreams 
**Created:** Tue Oct 20, 2015 06:41 PM UTC by Dave Brondsema
**Last Updated:** Tue Oct 20, 2015 06:41 PM UTC
**Owner:** nobody


When an activity happens on a project and the `create_timelines` task is run, 
that executes ActivityStream's `Aggregator.create_timeline`.  In a case where 
there are no new records for some reason, then it calls `get_timeline`.  This 
can be a problem because the pre-computed "timeline" there could potentially be 
thousands or millions of records.  This takes a while and can take up a ton of 
memory which doesn't get reclaimed after the task is done.

We should evaulate if that behavior is correct.  If it is needed, we should 
pass a `limit` parameter in.

Also perhaps see if we can figure out why these records aren't being garbage 
collected.


---

Sent from forge-allura.apache.org because [email protected] is subscribed 
to https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at 
https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/admin/tickets/options.  Or, if this is 
a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.

Reply via email to