-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18271/#review34864
-----------------------------------------------------------


The new test method does not make any assertions.  You should try using a 
Capture to verify the string URI's are the same.  Also (and this is my fault 
for not realizing it earlier), a year ago or so, the team agreed to use 
EasyMock instead of PowerMock.  If you can, please move this test class over to 
use EasyMock.

- Nate Cole


On Feb. 19, 2014, 10:25 a.m., Vitalyi Brodetskyi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/18271/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 19, 2014, 10:25 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Andrew Onischuk and Nate Cole.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-4738
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-4738
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> For completeness, we should have a unit test that verifies escaped urls are 
> covered. IE:
> 
> /proxy?url=http%3a%2f%2fserver%3a8188%2fws%2fv1%2fapptimeline%2fHIVE_QUERY_ID%3ffields=events%2cprimaryfilters%26limit=10%26primaryFilter=user%3ahiveuser1
> 
> In fact, requiring that syntax gets out of the substring/replace business and 
> just use the url parameter and make a URI out of it.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/proxy/ProxyServiceTest.java
>  b90af09 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18271/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
>  T E S T S
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Listening for transport dt_socket at address: 5007
> Running org.apache.ambari.server.proxy.ProxyServiceTest
> Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 68.465 sec
> 
> Results :
> 
> Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vitalyi Brodetskyi
> 
>

Reply via email to