-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30648/#review71370
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Nate Cole


On Feb. 5, 2015, 3:04 p.m., Alejandro Fernandez wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/30648/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 5, 2015, 3:04 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Dmitro Lisnichenko, Jonathan Hurley, Nate Cole, 
> Tom Beerbower, and Yurii Shylov.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-9485
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-9485
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add more debugging information for HDFS prepare and finalize steps.
> 
> Prepare:
> 1. With HA setup, the current code requires the NameNode NOT in safemode when 
> starting RU.
> 2. With non-HA setup, the current code requires the NameNode in safemode when 
> start RU.
> 
> The reason is that for non-HA setup, we need to do an extra checkpoint in the 
> single NN (by calling saveNamespace), which requires the NN to be in safemode 
> (to avoid namespace modification during the checkpoint). But for HA-setup, 
> the checkpoint is done by the standby NN, thus we do not need to put the 
> active NN into the safemode and in this way we can avoid service downtime.
> 
> We need to log what the original state is.
> 
> Finalize:
> This has a confusing message related to 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12679263/HDFS-7340.001.patch
> 
> ```
> [root@c6404 ~]# su - hdfs -c 'hdfs dfsadmin -rollingUpgrade query'
> QUERY rolling upgrade ...
> Proceed with rolling upgrade:
>   Block Pool ID: BP-819970438-192.168.64.104-1423091248521
>      Start Time: Thu Feb 05 01:15:16 UTC 2015 (=1423098916798)
>   Finalize Time: <NOT FINALIZED>
> 
> [root@c6404 ~]# su - hdfs -c 'hdfs dfsadmin -rollingUpgrade finalize'
> FINALIZE rolling upgrade ...
> There is no rolling upgrade in progress or rolling upgrade has already been 
> finalized.
> 
> [root@c6404 ~]# su - hdfs -c 'hdfs dfsadmin -rollingUpgrade query'
> QUERY rolling upgrade ...
> There is no rolling upgrade in progress or rolling upgrade has already been 
> finalized.
> ```
> 
> This means that the finalize did happen.
> We should run another "hdfs dfsadmin -rollingUpgrade query" after finalize to 
> ensure this happened.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/HDFS/2.1.0.2.0/package/scripts/namenode_upgrade.py
>  e11546c 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30648/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Installed a 3-node cluster with HDFS and ZK, and Namenode HA, then verified 
> that Namenode prepare showed the additional output, and that HDFS finalize 
> made it clear that it did happen.
> 
> Unit tests passed.
> 
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 29:57.240s
> [INFO] Finished at: Wed Feb 04 18:47:14 PST 2015
> [INFO] Final Memory: 60M/496M
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alejandro Fernandez
> 
>

Reply via email to