> On Feb. 6, 2015, 3:01 p.m., Robert Levas wrote:
> > I am not sure that this is the appropriate solution.  Does this hide the 
> > keytab value in the API call mentioned in the issue?

That api call show command output, and this patch hide keytab content in 
command output, so everythong is ok


- Eugene


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30723/#review71434
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 6, 2015, 1:36 p.m., Vitalyi Brodetskyi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/30723/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 6, 2015, 1:36 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Dmitro Lisnichenko and Robert Levas.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-9512
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-9512
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> I seems like we can see the contents of keytabs generated via Ambari from the 
> /api/v1/clusters/
> {clustername}
> /requests endpoint, which is also shown in the UI on the keytab tasks.
> This is a potential security risk, as anyone who has an Ambari account can 
> access them (including non-Admin, read-only users).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/KERBEROS/1.10.3-10/package/scripts/kerberos_common.py
>  b000c04 
>   ambari-server/src/test/python/stacks/2.2/KERBEROS/test_kerberos_client.py 
> 3bda3f9 
>   ambari-server/src/test/python/stacks/utils/RMFTestCase.py 85e229a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30723/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> mvn clean test
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vitalyi Brodetskyi
> 
>

Reply via email to