-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31212/#review73266
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Andrew Onischuk


On Feb. 20, 2015, 1:30 a.m., Alejandro Fernandez wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31212/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 20, 2015, 1:30 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Andrew Onischuk, Dmitro Lisnichenko, Jonathan 
> Hurley, Nate Cole, and Srimanth Gunturi.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-9717
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-9717
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Kafka and Spark service checks will fail intermittently.
> 
> Kafka runs a command to create a topic, which is expected to fail after being 
> ran once, and then greps the output to make sure that the topic was created 
> or already existed. The problem is that this will only work the first time, 
> since it was not ignorring stderr. Instead, just call the command, and 
> perform a regex match on the output.
> 
> Spark was not kiniting before doing its service check. I presume it worked 
> sometimes if some credenetial had already been cached.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/KAFKA/0.8.1.2.2/package/scripts/params.py
>  80b91b6 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/KAFKA/0.8.1.2.2/package/scripts/service_check.py
>  b10b602 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/SPARK/1.2.0.2.2/package/scripts/service_check.py
>  d00ae40 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31212/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Deployed a 3-node cluster with HDFS, Yarn, MR, TEZ, ZK, Ranger, Kafka, and 
> Spark, then added Namenode HA, Kerberized the cluster, and performed an RU.
> 
> Unit tests are in progress.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alejandro Fernandez
> 
>

Reply via email to